The Last Days: The Ascension of Christ (In Like Manner)

77

By searchinsany

The Ascension of Christ

The Ascension of Christ Rembrandt Van Rijn 1636
See all 3 photos
The Ascension of Christ Rembrandt Van Rijn 1636

The Last Days: The Ascension of Christ (In Like Manner)

Introduction

The 'In Like Manner' Question

Most scholars today and especially the proponents of Dispensationalism insist that Christ will return in the future and '...in like manner...' to His Ascension, with the emphasis on Him returning with the same body in which He ascended.

By allowing Scripture to interpret Scripture I will seek to prove otherwise because in my opinion, '...in like manner...' does not mean in identical manner.

Will Christ really return in the same body that He ascended with? Let's examine the implications of such a claim.

Acts 1:9-11 KJV

  • Act 1:9-11 And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. 10 And while they looked stedfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; 11 Which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven? this same Jesus, which is taken up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven.

Christ at the Second Coming and The Ascension

The Second Coming would comprise of the following constituent parts:

Angels

  • 2Th 1:7-8 KJV And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, 8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:

  • Mat 25:31 KJV When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:

Only two angels appeared at the Ascension…Acts 1:10, but the Scriptures teach that Christ would return with all the holy angels.

Trumpet

  • Mat 24:31 KJV And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.

Jesus ascended silently, yet those who propose a future return believe He will come with the literal sound of a trumpet.

Every Eye

  • Rev 1:7 KJV Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.

Jesus ascended visibly in the presence of a handful of disciples; Dispensationalism teaches that literally every eye shall see Him at His return.

White Horse

  • Rev 19:11 KJV And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.

Jesus did not ascend on a white horse!

'...In like manner...'? There are no similarities in the aforementioned comparison!

'Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more...'

  • Joh 14:19 KJV Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.

A major premise of Dispensationalism is the insistence that Jesus will return in the same physical body with which He ascended. Obviously this is to accommodate the theory that He will literally sit on a throne in Jerusalem; even although He said ‘...Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more...’

John’s Vision of Christ and The Ascension

  • Rev 1:13-16 KJV And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle. 14 His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; 15 And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters. 16 And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp twoedged sword: and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.

Jesus appeared to John in His post Ascension form, and what John described was resplendently different to the Jesus he had known.

Although He is the same Jesus there can be no doubt that His appearance now emphasises His Glorification and Deity.

Daniel's Prophecy

  • Dan 7:13 KJV I saw in the night visions, and, behold, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.

John could only say that the One he now saw was like the Son of Man, a term used by Daniel in his Messianic Prophecy.

  • 1Jn 1:1 KJV That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

'...and our hands have handled...' John had seen and touched Jesus during His earthly ministry; he witnessed His Transfiguration and was one of those taught by Him for forty days after His Resurrection.

If we also take into consideration the post resurrection appearances of Christ to 500 witnesses, we must conclude that they already knew what Jesus was like.

Yet clearly there were significant differences between the Christ of the Ascension and the Christ of The Revelation.

  • 1Jn 3:2 KJV Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.

'...for we shall see him as he is...' John wrote in his 1st Epistle ‘…it doth not yet appear what we shall be…’ then added ‘…when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is...’

Why did John make this statement if he believed Jesus would return in the resurrection body of the Ascension?

A Quote from Adam Clarke's Commentary on the Bible

1 John 3:2 'John had seen his glory on the mount when he was transfigured; and this we find was ineffably grand; but even this must have been partially obscured, in order to enable the disciples to bear the sight, for they were not then like him. But when they shall be like him, they shall see him as he is - in all the splendor of his infinite majesty.’

John was anticipating the imminent Parousia of the glorified Christ coming in His Majesty and Deity!

The Transfiguration of Christ

The Transfiguration of Christ Raphael 1520
The Transfiguration of Christ Raphael 1520
Source: Wikipedia

The Transfiguration was a vision of the passing away of the Old Covenant glory, symbolized by the departing of Moses and Elijah…Luke 9:33; thus making way for the greater New Covenant glory of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Christ at The Transfiguration and The Ascension

  • Mat 17:2 KJV And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light.

  • Mat 17:3-5 KJV And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him. 4 Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. 5 While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

Peter did not fully understand the significance of the vision; he may have thought the three persons were of equal greatness and stature, thereby suggesting three tabernacles.

  • Luk 9:35-36 KJV And there came a voice out of the cloud, saying, This is my beloved Son: hear him. 36 And when the voice was past, Jesus was found alone. And they kept it close, and told no man in those days any of those things which they had seen.

However Peter was left in no doubt as to whom the greater glory belonged when the Voice of the Lord spoke out of the cloud.

The Transfiguration Was a Vision of the Passing Away of the Old Covenant

  • Heb 8:13 KJV In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

The Transfiguration was a vision of the passing away of the Old Covenant glory, symbolized by the departing of Moses and Elijah…Luke 9:33; thus making way for the greater New Covenant glory of the Lord Jesus Christ.

The Transfiguration Was Also a Vision of the Christ of the Parousia

  • 2Pe 1:16 KJV For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

Because he had been present at the Transfiguration, Peter in his 2nd Epistle was able to proclaim to the scoffers that he was an eyewitness ‘of His majesty’. He had seen the glorified Christ and preached the imminent return of Jesus with confidence.

Since Jesus promised to return during the lifetime of His generation, we must concur that these two events portrayed at the Transfiguration would take place simultaneously.

When did the Old Covenant vanish away? It vanished away at the time of the destruction of the Temple, the Levitical Priesthood, Jerusalem, and the dispersion of the Jews in AD 70. Therefore the Second Coming took place also in AD 70.

  • Luk 19:15 KJV And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.

'...having received the kingdom...' The Ascension not only brought Jesus’ earthly ministry to a glorious conclusion, it was the commencement of His heavenly Priesthood and Kingship as He entered into the heavenly Holy of Holies.

Likewise the Parousia was a glorious occasion when the ‘King of Kings and Lord of Lords’ returned.

Jesus Ascended Gloriously and Jesus Returned Gloriously!

Paul's Vision of Christ and The Ascension

‘…Who art thou, Lord?'

  • Act 9:3-7 KJV And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: 4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? 5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. 6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.

Paul asked ‘…Who art thou, Lord’?…’ when Jesus confronted him, no doubt Paul had heard many first hand accounts and descriptions of Jesus, but he did not recognise ‘this’ Jesus. He trembled and was astonished by the encounter.

Once again we have a vision of the glorified Christ. If Jesus was to return in His resurrection body, why do we constantly find manifestations of a totally transformed Christ after His Ascension?

Christ at His Resurrection and The Ascension...John 20:17

Some scholars today teach that Jesus rose from the dead in His glorified body. In my opinion, Jesus rose from the dead in the same body that was placed in the tomb; His glorification took place after the Ascension.

Others claim He received His glorified body having ascended to heaven soon after the Resurrection, but prior to the actual ‘Ascension’. This particular view is based on their interpretation of John 20:17.

  • Joh 20:17 KJV Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.

‘…Touch me not…’ Jesus did not restrain Mary from touching Him for any scriptural or spiritual reason, He simply wanted Mary to go quickly and inform the dejected disciples of the good news of His Resurrection.

A Quote from Adam Clarke's Commentary of the Bible

John 20:17 'Touch me not - Μη μου ἁπτου, Cling not to me. Ἁπτομαι has this sense in Job_31:7, where the Septuagint use it for the Hebrew דבק dabak, which signifies to cleave, cling, stick, or be glued to. From Mat_28:9, it appears that some of the women held him by the feet and worshipped him. This probably Mary did; and our Lord seems to have spoken to her to this effect: “Spend no longer time with me now: I am not going immediately to heaven - you will have several opportunities of seeing me again: but go and tell my disciples, that I am, by and by, to ascend to my Father and God, who is your Father and God also. Therefore, let them take courage.'
  • Joh 20:27-29 KJV Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. 28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

'...Thomas, Reach hither thy finger...' It is assumed because Jesus discouraged Mary from touching Him, yet later invited Thomas to ‘…Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side:...’ that He had ascended to His Father during the intervening period.

  • Mat 28:9-10 KJV And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him. 10 Then said Jesus unto them, Be not afraid: go tell my brethren that they go into Galilee, and there shall they see me.

In Matthew's account however, Jesus did not forbid the women from touching or worshipping Him!

  • Joh 20:26 KJV And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you.

Jesus Walking on the Sea

Jesus Walking on the Sea Gustave Doré 1832-1883
Jesus Walking on the Sea Gustave Doré 1832-1883

'...the doors being shut...' It is also unsustainable to claim that Jesus’ resurrected body was His glorified body because He could appear in a room with all the doors closed.

  • Mat 14:26 KJV And when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear.

This is easily refuted by comparing the occasion when Jesus walked on the sea. This incident was equally miraculous and occurred prior to the Resurrection.

The motive behind the teaching is to support the Eschatological position held by scholars who demand a less glorified Christ, to accommodate their theory that Christ in His human form will sit in the Temple in Jerusalem during the Millennium.

  • Act 2:34-35 KJV For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, 35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.

‘…Sit thou on my right hand…’ This did not happen directly after His Resurrection; He spent forty days with His disciples before that glorious event.

However, Jesus was to be King not only over Israel; He was to be King of Kings. Peter declared Jesus was resurrected from the dead…Acts 2:22 and the recipient of the Promise made to David that his descendant would sit on his throne…Acts 2:30-33.

Where was that throne located?

Peter made it clear, the Messiah was to sit on the Throne of David in Heaven, not on earth.

Christ now appears in all the glory of His Deity, not as He was before or after the Resurrection, but as He is since His Ascension!

The Glorified Christ and the Ascension

  • Joh 17:5 KJV And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.

The Ascension was the resumption of Jesus’ preincarnate Glory, in keeping with His prayer that He should receive the Glory that was His before the foundation of the world.

This meant that He not only cast aside the limitations which characterized His life on Earth, He added His inherent Glory as the second person of the Trinity.

  • Php 2:9-11 KJV Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

The Father highly exalted Him in recognition of His triumph over the Death and Sin.

The Cloud of the Lord and the Ascension

Before concluding this study there is one common denominator worthy of mention, that being the significance of the ‘Cloud of the Lord’.

The Theophanic ‘Cloud of the Lord’ is mentioned on occasion in the Scriptures and was the visible manifestation of the Divine Presence.

The Old Covenant 'Cloud of the Lord'

  • Exo 24:17-18 KJV And the sight of the glory of the LORD was like devouring fire on the top of the mount in the eyes of the children of Israel. 18 And Moses went into the midst of the cloud, and gat him up into the mount: and Moses was in the mount forty days and forty nights.

Here we find an Old Testament type and shadow of Christ’s Ascension ‘...and Moses goeth into the midst of the cloud, and gat him up unto the mount…’ It is interesting to note that when Moses entered the cloud he returned after ‘…forty days and forty nights...’, Christ returned after forty years. The significance of the number 40 in the Scriptures would make an interesting study for another time.

  • Exo 34:29 KJV And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Sinai with the two tables of testimony in Moses' hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses knew not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him.

Moses not only ascended into the midst of the cloud, but while there he received the Old Covenant, likewise when Christ ascended to His Father He received the New Covenant.

  • Exo 34:30 KJV And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him.

'...and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength'...Revelation 1:16.

Moses face shone when he returned, how much greater was the glorified Christ in John’s vision? …Revelation 1:13-16.

  • 2Co 3:7-11 KJV But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not steadfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: 8 How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious? 9 For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory. 10 For even that which was made glorious had no glory in this respect, by reason of the glory that excelleth. 11 For if that which is done away was glorious, much more that which remaineth is glorious.

'...much more that which remaineth is glorious...' The Old Covenant glory was to be eclipsed by the New Covenant glory.

Since Moses’ appearance was changed having been in the presence of the Lord, is it not likely that the appearance of Jesus at His return would have been even more glorious?

The glorified Christ returned in majesty on the ‘Cloud of the Lord’, neither having the same physical appearance with which He ascended, nor returning with a physical body on a mere literal cumulus cloud.

Taking into consideration that the Ascension and the Parousia of Christ were events which took place during the last days of the Old Covenant Age, there is no reason why the ‘Cloud of the Lord’ should not be in attendance at its culmination.

  • Act 1:9 KJV And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.

  • Rev 14:14 KJV And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle.

A Quote from Baker's Evangelical Dictionary

‘The Old Testament. The Literal Cloud. Natural phenomena involving clouds are depicted occasionally in the Old Testament, but far from being only "natural," these are invariably linked with the direct activity of God…’‘The Theophanic/Eschatological Cloud. The remaining twenty-two New Testament occurrences of the word "cloud" appear in the context of theophany, and encompass six theologically crucial, eschatologically related events or visionary scenes in salvation history: (1) the pillar of cloud at the exodus, viewed as a type of Christian baptism in the time of eschatological fulfillment (1 Cor 10:1-2); (2) Jesus' transfiguration, as a foretaste of the kingdom of God, during which the Father appears and speaks in a cloud (Matt 17:5; Mark 9:7; Luke 9:34); (3) Jesus' ascension, explained by the angels as a paradigm for his return (Acts 1:9); (4) the "mighty angel" descending from heaven wrapped in a cloud, announcing (against the eschatological backdrop of (Dan 12:7) that time should be no longer (Rev 10:1); (5) the two resurrected witnesses ascending to heaven in a cloud, described in the context of the eschatological measuring of the temple of God (Rev11:12); and (6) Jesus' parousia, against the backdrop of Daniel 7:13, as the Son of Man coming with/on/in a cloud/the clouds/the clouds of heaven (Matt 24:30; 26:64; Mark 13:26;14:62; Luke12:54; 21:27; 1 Thess 4:17; Rev 1:7; 14:14-16)’.

A Cloud Received Jesus When He ascended, and He Returned ‘…Upon the Cloud…’

Conclusion

In all the comparisons examined, Jesus was seen with the effulgent glory of Deity shining through; this was not the case at His Ascension. The emphasis at the Second Coming was the Deity of Christ, not His humanity.

'In Like Manner'

Jesus Ascended Gloriously and Jesus Returned Gloriously With Theophanic Clouds!

What do you think?

The Last Days: Will the Church Really Be 'Raptured'?...Read More>>

Is Jesus Really Deity?...Read More>>

Comments

Lone Ranger 4 months ago

Searchinsany:

Quality scholarship as always and always well presented.

I have a question for you, if you don't mind me asking. But, do you think that the angels seen in the clouds above the skies of Jerusalem in A.D. 70, as written by Josephus, was the actual "Second Coming" of our Lord?

If not, what do you think was happening and why do you think the angels were there?

The above referrence to this account of Josephus is found in The Jewish War: Book 6; Chapter 5; sections 297-300 from which we read:

(297) "...on the one and twentieth day of the month Artemisius, a certain great and incredible phenomenon appeared: I suppose the account of it would seem to be a fable, were it not related by those that saw it,

(298) and were not the events that followed it of so considerable a nature as to deserve such signals; for, before sunsetting, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor were seen

(299) running about among the clouds, and surrounding of cities. Moreover, at that feast which we call Pentecost, as the priests were going by night into the inner court of the temple, as their custom was, to perform their sacred ministrations, they said that, in the first place, they felt a quaking, and heard a great noise,

(300) and after that they heard a great sound as of a great multitude, saying 'Let us remove from here.'"

I know this is slightly off-topic, but there are those that say that Christ couldn't have returned because "we are still here" and it should be obvious to all that "the dead have not risen".

What say you? Could the resurrection of the dead have been executed in a different manner then what we might expect? If so, what do you think it could have looked like? If Christ's second coming is a bit different than expected, could the resurrection of the dead also be misunderstood?

I will patiently await your reply. Best wishes - L.R.

searchinsany profile image

searchinsany Hub Author 4 months ago

Lone Ranger

Thanks again for visiting my Hubs, and for the questions you ask in your comment.

I do believe that the Second Coming of Christ took place in AD 70. Josephus is a highly regarded historian, and his eye witness account makes interesting reading. However, what he recorded is not crucial to my viewpoint; the issue is what do the Scriptures tell us.

Jesus promised an imminent return and all the writers of the New Testament wrote about it with great expectation. Did Jesus get it wrong and give them false hope? Of course not! In my opinion the problem lies with us.

For the sake of brevity, my other Hubs answer many of the issues raised by my presupposition.

The Scriptures state that the Resurrection would take place at Christ’s Return, if Jesus kept His promises then it must have occurred. The Resurrection was not a physical resurrection; it was a spiritual rising of the dead from Hades.

When Jesus returned he fulfilled all God's promises to Old Covenant Israel, which brought an end to the Old Covenant Age. The outward manifestation included the destruction of the Temple, Jerusalem and the dispersion of the Jews in AD 70.

May I hasten to add that my Hub ‘Heresy: Hymenaeus and Philetus’ will clarify my view on the Resurrection in more detail.

Lone Ranger 4 months ago

Thank you, my friend:

Indeed. I, too, had theorized that the resurrection of the "quick and the dead" referred to those dying in faith and those dying in shame, prior to A.D. 70.

I look forward to reading more of your insights!!!

Peace be with you - L.R.

searchinsany profile image

searchinsany Hub Author 4 months ago

Lone Ranger

Many thanks for your interest in my Hubs, please keep in touch.

Diligent1 2 months ago

Thank you again. I have indeed learned quite a bit. Have you similarly prepared a hub on the subject of 'The Comforter"?

searchinsany profile image

searchinsany Hub Author 2 months ago

Diligent1

Thank you, I don't have a Hub on 'The Comforter' but it is on my list.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working